{"id":"W1998592389","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.009","title":"Measure for Measure: A two study multi-trait multi-method investigation of construct validity in IS research","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers in Human Behavior","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Trait; Construct (python library); Measure (data warehouse); Cognitive psychology; Construct validity; Perception; Cognition; Set (abstract data type); Arousal; Matrix (chemical analysis); Computer science; Social psychology; Psychometrics; Data mining; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003253568,0.0002363987,0.000500049,0.0007440775,0.0001852475,0.00004759082,0.0005278809,0.0002206465,0.0004122752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006827479,0.0002526153,0.0001729132,0.0005751311,0.0003052259,0.0001815459,0.0001135952,0.0007574586,0.00002895145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002166514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009380163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008481953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003716875,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954501,0.001726828,0.001105383,0.0006750506,0.0004107242,0.0006319282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980756,0.0002775812,0.0002241905,0.0006186615,0.0005975313,0.0002064071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004390327,0.003586552,0.9317407,0.00004361327,0.00001420744,0.00001287839,0.009543619,0.0000025777,0.002844556,0.0002828976,0.001587858,0.05029661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007020261,0.0009638665,0.9888288,0.0002025625,0.00003702383,0.000005481075,0.001795713,0.0003588031,0.000378544,0.0001732027,0.00001522229,0.0002204996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886161,0.00006125612,0.004972363,0.00007671606,0.0008086027,0.005329454,0.00005881157,0.00004510552,0.00003156735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570923,3.009089e-7,0.04000378,0.00005723939,0.00005358905,0.002605589,0.00002584964,0.00003647173,0.0001248573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0570881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5209594800076693,"score_gpt":0.5530363424924677,"score_spread":0.03207686248479835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}