{"id":"W1998613972","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1276","title":"First-Degree Discrimination by a Duopoly: Pricing and Quality Choice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Duopoly; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Microeconomics; Economics; Price discrimination; Pareto principle; Quality (philosophy); Contrast (vision); Function (biology); Welfare; Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Cournot competition; Operations management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001806626,0.0002657679,0.0006378149,0.0002500013,0.0009214854,0.002887819,0.0006342515,0.001368016,0.002652028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00826411,0.0002356779,0.0004540748,0.0003983207,0.002160815,0.002267185,0.001323798,0.001577065,0.0001649946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001368354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004868316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002562972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001988014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986877,0.0005174676,0.00004984271,0.0001843062,0.0001840108,0.0003765571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945831,0.002645812,0.001319133,0.0005537622,0.0002725556,0.0006256162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001373747,0.0009351008,0.05444978,0.000162582,0.0001569998,0.001374925,0.001714229,0.03334072,0.01665926,0.8537645,0.001227247,0.03484081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002931783,0.0007127525,0.0460595,0.00008338989,0.00008561977,0.00137195,0.002737905,0.1898575,0.005062179,0.7497777,0.003850143,0.0001080941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9649792,0.0001887662,0.0162977,0.0005969587,0.00001194911,0.0000287431,0.00002226834,0.00000776298,0.0178666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990523,0.00003355987,0.0004571048,0.00002489818,0.000003455694,0.000002817761,0.000003499217,8.191789e-7,0.0004216072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002887819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009928167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03650154364931597,"score_gpt":0.2591406847898846,"score_spread":0.2226391411405687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}