{"id":"W1998613972","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1276","title":"First-Degree Discrimination by a Duopoly: Pricing and Quality Choice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Duopoly; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Microeconomics; Economics; Price discrimination; Pareto principle; Quality (philosophy); Contrast (vision); Function (biology); Welfare; Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Cournot competition; Operations management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003901169,0.0001067492,0.0003594256,0.0001331743,0.0001280924,0.00005789298,0.0002650821,0.00006037754,0.0004909636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003214246,0.00008574314,0.0001380621,0.0000940059,0.0002584714,0.000167084,0.00005434982,0.0001982476,0.0000331711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008806412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009387675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006540436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005829558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998625,0.00003897621,0.0009887299,0.0001244184,0.00003295693,0.0001898723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983466,0.0005882446,0.0006971381,0.0001994596,0.00004168224,0.0001268401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005874762,0.00004480686,0.004539505,0.00001103738,0.00006489011,3.154206e-7,0.0003084619,0.00003799241,0.00002152508,0.9935462,0.0001893022,0.001177193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001352561,0.0002251656,0.05360247,0.00003751268,0.0001279118,0.00005767516,0.001069381,0.006596848,0.0006303795,0.9108014,0.02503979,0.0004588885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8976827,0.001487953,0.07319476,0.005756186,0.0002703319,0.00007106801,0.00002613039,0.000007753988,0.02150306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976606,0.00107881,0.0003551862,0.0005777314,0.0001443938,5.035303e-7,0.000001756968,0.00001180231,0.0001692555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09997781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5375707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03650154364931597,"score_gpt":0.2591406847898846,"score_spread":0.2226391411405687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}