{"id":"W1998637654","doi":"10.1080/13574800600644381","title":"Does Design Matter? The Ecological Footprint as a Planning Tool at the Local Level","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Design","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Rocky Mountain College; University of Waterloo; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Subdivision; Urban design; Community planning; Consumption (sociology); Harmony (color); New Urbanism; Urban ecology; Sustainability; Housing estate; Urban planning; Geography; Environmental resource management; Architectural engineering; Urbanism; Ecology; Civil engineering; Sociology; Engineering; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Architecture; Urbanization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004698667,0.0003062772,0.0005845858,0.001337426,0.001657896,0.005855729,0.0008644262,0.000865043,0.007447231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007113174,0.0002716087,0.0003940338,0.004125535,0.008608004,0.009640114,0.002183629,0.0008551091,0.0006894962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002664653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001797578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003533327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009873332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953688,0.002887158,0.0001207481,0.0002675272,0.001003344,0.0003523518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995843,0.002464464,0.0003880395,0.0004925738,0.0005495019,0.0002624012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004181007,0.000297781,0.151323,0.0020313,0.0001855732,0.0006339275,0.05288844,0.006595353,0.002110664,0.3241737,0.01120023,0.4481418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006282466,0.00132914,0.2240648,0.0024435,0.0004011068,0.001278946,0.2620358,0.003597063,0.003023129,0.1992842,0.3023089,0.0001705703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6273161,0.01099216,0.0358176,0.01551837,0.0002179493,0.0001273858,0.0003353516,0.0001722734,0.3095028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869965,0.001744297,0.006130291,0.0006013085,0.00002659912,0.00005645665,0.00008219778,0.00006896091,0.00429329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007447231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02491349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06314517138027978,"score_gpt":0.3006334851635127,"score_spread":0.237488313783233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}