{"id":"W1998659948","doi":"10.1177/154193120705101844","title":"Assessing temporal support for dynamic decision making in C2","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Military Strategy and Technology","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamic decision-making; Computer science; Decision support system; Geospatial analysis; Scheduling (production processes); Situation awareness; Key (lock); Human–computer interaction; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Computer security; Engineering; Operations management; Remote sensing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002164911,0.0004453831,0.0002617008,0.0005968138,0.0004042943,0.001804795,0.0004558859,0.0006547649,0.005754689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03106419,0.0001577916,0.0002096971,0.0005793726,0.0002841409,0.001218222,0.0009244151,0.0005257675,0.0004165276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005231994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001047039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004293914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003941884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988921,0.0004017375,0.00008637742,0.0001605789,0.0003447864,0.0001145613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779419,0.01582135,0.002453548,0.001140651,0.001529131,0.001113332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02308467,0.006492946,0.4365786,0.001279177,0.0004904072,0.0011448,0.01406287,0.05500575,0.1142538,0.00734891,0.004284924,0.3359732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007737561,0.01241665,0.7775421,0.0003467655,0.0003469884,0.0008566521,0.008202418,0.1522365,0.02562155,0.007573315,0.01366356,0.0004197544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956231,0.00004183803,0.001776531,0.00004872115,0.000007312764,0.00004405217,0.00008936271,0.00003471876,0.002334381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958109,0.00005317492,0.003354363,0.00003307893,0.00000725512,0.00005452685,0.0001831111,0.00001312831,0.0004905381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005754689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01925135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01367911910820408,"score_gpt":0.2660204870624703,"score_spread":0.2523413679542663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}