{"id":"W1998703085","doi":"10.1115/ipc2010-31060","title":"KOC’s Integrity Management Program for Non-Piggable Pipelines: A Case Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 1","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"TransCanada (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Integrity management; Pipeline transport; Pipeline (software); Computer science; Asset management; Process (computing); Asset (computer security); Risk analysis (engineering); Risk management; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Computer security; Business; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002065462,0.0004889374,0.0002309493,0.001374992,0.003587719,0.001694683,0.00165734,0.002223668,0.002655423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005187535,0.000420384,0.0004332778,0.001605448,0.001143218,0.001664598,0.001141928,0.001335517,0.0005101293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00486539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004636295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06096799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08964951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978573,0.0005907821,0.0001000086,0.00022629,0.000898074,0.0003275069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959735,0.00127163,0.0004930012,0.0003692375,0.001370599,0.0005220289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001121384,0.008699764,0.2881745,0.001560494,0.0001956753,0.1897414,0.05082561,0.07399623,0.04631353,0.02869835,0.04257937,0.2680936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002705844,0.007647243,0.295552,0.0008997658,0.0003273847,0.08695867,0.1369655,0.1627913,0.07030624,0.006432474,0.2313423,0.0005066021],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9620816,0.0002061242,0.01467803,0.001407332,0.00002662041,0.0006707081,0.0002370545,0.000218863,0.02047375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737223,0.0004212901,0.01346003,0.0002387205,0.00001512586,0.0001530017,0.0002709051,0.00006135065,0.01165729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06096799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1212262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02310121971464006,"score_gpt":0.2960116345976289,"score_spread":0.2729104148829888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}