{"id":"W1998703085","doi":"10.1115/ipc2010-31060","title":"KOC’s Integrity Management Program for Non-Piggable Pipelines: A Case Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 1","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"TransCanada (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Integrity management; Pipeline transport; Pipeline (software); Computer science; Asset management; Process (computing); Asset (computer security); Risk analysis (engineering); Risk management; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Computer security; Business; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005170912,0.00040256,0.0004270868,0.0003335331,0.0001718772,0.0002993238,0.0007462433,0.0002650235,0.001756311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001712539,0.0003516508,0.0002775361,0.0002933608,0.0001314019,0.0003152052,0.0001453078,0.001131069,0.0001641003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008065302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000513268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001255659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004122875,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978014,0.00002753394,0.0007549328,0.0005569638,0.0004224187,0.0004367024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980986,0.00008728844,0.0001072683,0.0005669561,0.0009508284,0.0001890975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004616705,0.005559805,0.04175071,0.001160625,0.004202454,0.001892189,0.003839401,0.00707987,0.004236958,0.008636787,0.2754636,0.6457159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001477134,0.0001778918,0.002091962,0.00004157042,0.0002344477,0.0002821416,0.003170999,0.9165952,0.0003532999,0.001602604,0.07338847,0.0005842777],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9289384,0.00002338313,0.04627925,0.0009851556,0.008685146,0.002630352,0.0002387342,0.0007936585,0.01142595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688171,0.00002690563,0.01719618,0.00006698573,0.0007800809,0.0006080906,0.000173549,0.00004499285,0.01228609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9095153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02310121971464006,"score_gpt":0.2960116345976289,"score_spread":0.2729104148829888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}