{"id":"W1998769099","doi":"10.2190/36xe-j1pb-hmwq-cxyw","title":"Heuristic and Formative Evaluation: A Case Study Illustration of a New Technique","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Educational Computing Research","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Computer science; Think aloud protocol; Heuristic; Heuristic evaluation; Instructional design; Warrant; Mathematics education; Multimedia; Human–computer interaction; Usability; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1349081,0.002011503,0.001178228,0.005539558,0.00385064,0.009215807,0.00466246,0.004197206,0.002832181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1807943,0.0009821118,0.001197914,0.004173481,0.007053722,0.008799706,0.004991544,0.003476856,0.0008173115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00436826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005804249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002123952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004217957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7750134,0.1888566,0.005368852,0.003672037,0.02447219,0.002616901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7420183,0.1962329,0.007376667,0.0274981,0.02462431,0.002249674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001185042,0.004960609,0.01587249,0.003666654,0.0002323464,0.005482009,0.1485271,0.006828811,0.01282516,0.115221,0.007428293,0.6777705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002197744,0.02337724,0.0203369,0.01044746,0.0008413263,0.02605096,0.1756529,0.1423378,0.09537482,0.1594988,0.3425445,0.001339653],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1645182,0.001510973,0.7631994,0.006593762,0.0006444929,0.009694199,0.0001518688,0.0008390194,0.05284798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2746947,0.0005255429,0.7137566,0.0005510797,0.0001661684,0.004318552,0.00007723872,0.0001653248,0.005744788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1349081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7134706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2079224208921127,"score_gpt":0.5447775658568189,"score_spread":0.3368551449647062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}