{"id":"W1998780427","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-2979.2006.00228.x","title":"Projecting future fish supplies using stock dynamics and demand","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fish and Fisheries","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Global Change Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg; North Pacific Marine Science Organization","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Sustainability; Supply and demand; Economics; Natural resource economics; Fish stock; Climate change; Population; Demand management; Population dynamics of fisheries; Fishery; Microeconomics; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Macroeconomics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001289427,0.0001669964,0.0001719669,0.00002896601,0.0003943736,0.000239412,0.0001022119,0.0001062419,0.001174948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000202138,0.0001521723,0.0000256241,0.0001624397,0.0003637185,0.0004283228,0.0003486644,0.000177964,0.00000188135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005427213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008811109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001711966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008212141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989161,0.00002995611,0.0001699573,0.000323835,0.0002066138,0.0003535037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996809,0.00003435857,0.00004780717,0.0001454379,0.00001041403,0.0000810556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003394436,0.00002219268,0.9560234,0.00004530962,0.000007079841,0.00001271898,0.0002874255,0.000005109995,0.00008719484,0.0001080948,0.01661249,0.02675505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006592979,0.0001839091,0.6188058,0.00001156855,0.00002696303,0.0001340452,0.002322427,0.017433,0.0001638043,0.001019399,0.3586256,0.0006142598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8967896,0.00001792245,0.0001837066,0.001978651,0.00007968547,0.0002177782,0.00004358528,0.0000485148,0.1006406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788957,0.0002333396,0.0039474,0.001102104,0.0007048405,0.00004527284,0.0001411107,0.00006289405,0.01486732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3420131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01027986245228681,"score_gpt":0.2195958492602761,"score_spread":0.2093159868079893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}