{"id":"W1998804657","doi":"10.1037/spq0000001","title":"The impact of probe variability on brief experimental analysis of reading skills.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"School Psychology Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Society for the Study of School Psychology","keywords":"Fluency; Psychology; Replicate; Reading (process); Set (abstract data type); Intervention (counseling); Replication (statistics); Psychological intervention; Reliability (semiconductor); Developmental psychology; Statistics; Mathematics education; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001852981,0.0002549705,0.0005592628,0.0003759638,0.000115767,0.00001973137,0.0004026704,0.0001996334,0.001594251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008830873,0.0001704648,0.0004633199,0.0008230032,0.0002469417,0.0001304813,0.00001505178,0.0003119244,0.0001569182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001142934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003846442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002170304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000277278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971764,0.0007153865,0.0008311732,0.0004425241,0.0002216636,0.0006128708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975501,0.0004898626,0.0004339962,0.001217026,0.00009437567,0.0002146446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008057274,0.003375997,0.9188658,0.000007696211,0.004715501,0.000003219462,0.02643652,0.000007755832,0.006738965,0.007214091,0.01004881,0.02177992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007162252,0.001357389,0.9951743,0.00001543904,0.0001715458,0.000009139115,0.0009492525,0.000008439943,0.0003619936,0.0004548318,0.0006047635,0.0001766502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718621,0.0002227918,0.0004548947,0.0001035206,0.001004588,0.000292551,0.00002834375,0.00003661993,0.02599462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985953,0.000002974337,0.0003588065,0.000120857,0.0001146838,0.00007840457,0.00002263412,0.00002097371,0.0006853625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07630853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01601655952709992,"score_gpt":0.3827578900125684,"score_spread":0.3667413304854685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}