{"id":"W1998807801","doi":"10.1155/2012/741729","title":"On the Potential of Least Squares Response Method for the Calibration of Superconducting Gravimeters","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Geophysics","topic":"Geophysics and Gravity Measurements","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Cape Town; Ryerson University","keywords":"Calibration; Algorithm; Computer science; Scale factor (cosmology); Scale (ratio); Analytical Chemistry (journal); Mathematics; Statistics; Chemistry; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007035674,0.001504542,0.0008299098,0.001674541,0.0005763876,0.001266102,0.00189364,0.001739946,0.003229582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02142895,0.0006343624,0.00119468,0.001919267,0.001243473,0.001942778,0.001673002,0.002491769,0.002863234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007161174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001334613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004561928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002152585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954621,0.002486981,0.0001262488,0.0006646725,0.00114427,0.0001156652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930282,0.004118955,0.0003710747,0.0008893305,0.001505502,0.00008681953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004234712,0.0001658848,0.00354702,0.0005038333,0.0002712527,0.000266253,0.0004339861,0.3507708,0.02421765,0.1430583,0.007768345,0.4685732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003048847,0.00007805049,0.0007291306,0.00005919833,0.00002322985,0.0001029277,0.0000597097,0.9384183,0.006805864,0.04327933,0.01033898,0.00007473877],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001612073,0.0002910409,0.9962232,0.0001459237,0.0000615873,0.00002251568,0.00002951105,0.0007454712,0.0008687828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09346898,0.0008664891,0.8999568,0.0002824127,0.0002294554,0.0001729744,0.0003719315,0.0007347288,0.003916194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007035674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03720862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03914841994720107,"score_gpt":0.2832308059347436,"score_spread":0.2440823859875425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}