{"id":"W1998829509","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.026","title":"A game-theoretic formulation of joint implementation of environmental projects","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Joint (building); Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Welfare; Game theory; Joint Implementation; Interpretation (philosophy); Operations research; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Engineering; Emissions trading","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031401,0.00006303771,0.0002000733,0.0004129979,0.0000558053,0.00002940434,0.0001496837,0.00001668743,0.0007465567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109956,0.00006555014,0.00008909725,0.0001101924,0.00009080845,0.0002888406,0.00005681558,0.0001472113,0.00008363407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001765305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006915675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003475314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005551145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998589,0.00007865553,0.0009502119,0.0001064598,0.0001193164,0.0001562924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992166,0.00004439018,0.0004871532,0.0001050903,0.00009059752,0.00005613305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002923057,0.0006596886,0.03247746,0.0002168409,0.0001906636,0.00002785871,0.0182406,0.004414225,0.02756674,0.9112111,0.0003334535,0.004369106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009947794,0.004353148,0.7848541,0.0003059343,0.00002191641,0.0001751315,0.00781081,0.001682619,0.07250851,0.1140296,0.003785418,0.0005249924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927329,0.0002357288,0.000913011,0.0005156038,0.00006235293,0.000145966,0.00014622,0.000001200796,0.005247002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984757,0.000348155,0.0009411486,0.00003101035,0.0001305005,0.000001490877,0.00002016975,0.00001514418,0.000036678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7971814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8174273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2355838190111852,"score_gpt":0.3578740084426785,"score_spread":0.1222901894314933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}