{"id":"W1998829509","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.026","title":"A game-theoretic formulation of joint implementation of environmental projects","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Joint (building); Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Welfare; Game theory; Joint Implementation; Interpretation (philosophy); Operations research; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Engineering; Emissions trading","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004855175,0.001372725,0.001787342,0.001093776,0.001364977,0.005528549,0.004739843,0.007501043,0.01484548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01280816,0.001679241,0.001682001,0.002025881,0.00345834,0.006736038,0.00270798,0.003600076,0.0006677448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004277132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004788688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01292419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01038211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956959,0.002520863,0.0001700588,0.0004367124,0.0005266693,0.000649777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950446,0.003391909,0.000430904,0.0002413372,0.0004035268,0.0004876599],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003423285,0.00005284822,0.0001958532,0.00004783339,0.00003077801,0.000122212,0.0001311963,0.1830789,0.0001848243,0.8117468,0.001278936,0.003095601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007437634,0.000062453,0.0001569974,0.00002926111,0.00003536859,0.00006623261,0.0001353193,0.4304598,0.0001433878,0.565077,0.003735402,0.0000244344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06074889,0.0007694146,0.7909202,0.01012453,0.0002047398,0.0003656549,0.0004942831,0.0001654012,0.1362069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9078037,0.000684306,0.06152032,0.0004111539,0.0001903485,0.0005011476,0.0001433824,0.00006835086,0.02867724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01484548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04966313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2355838190111852,"score_gpt":0.3578740084426785,"score_spread":0.1222901894314933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}