{"id":"W1998838751","doi":"10.1139/p10-088","title":"Analytic formula for charged particle impact ionization cross-section","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Atomic and Molecular Physics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Ionization; Cross section (physics); Wave function; Amplitude; Charged particle; Born approximation; Coulomb; Atomic physics; Scattering cross-section; Coulomb wave function; Electron ionization; Electron; Particle (ecology); Function (biology); Differential (mechanical device); Quantum mechanics; Ion; Scattering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006339242,0.0009808574,0.0006232953,0.001736861,0.0006507557,0.0008436068,0.001279187,0.0008413831,0.00765962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002201666,0.0002803473,0.0007149323,0.0008459227,0.0007541559,0.001212659,0.001177369,0.0008758528,0.00271106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001389914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001128365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002493867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00289281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997094,0.00003714368,0.00001633251,0.00003284628,0.0001618307,0.00004234513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999562,0.0001573762,0.00004570601,0.00004654342,0.0001627946,0.00002555645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002176278,0.00004712705,0.0007442558,0.0003637779,0.00002702591,0.000795376,0.0002848996,0.1346438,0.01513158,0.8167153,0.004762617,0.02646249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001951947,0.00003220845,0.0008350234,0.0002041202,0.00003624873,0.001114637,0.0001000184,0.7162884,0.007418694,0.2634783,0.01041135,0.000061557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02988238,0.002495019,0.8935615,0.0007747889,0.0002641029,0.0001427017,0.0004859536,0.0006862655,0.07170726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6458136,0.009065905,0.2965529,0.0009438324,0.0003090748,0.0006302275,0.0009547431,0.00093433,0.04479539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00765962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02562398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01023634053127786,"score_gpt":0.2733992107536453,"score_spread":0.2631628702223675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}