{"id":"W1998838751","doi":"10.1139/p10-088","title":"Analytic formula for charged particle impact ionization cross-section","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Atomic and Molecular Physics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Ionization; Cross section (physics); Wave function; Amplitude; Charged particle; Born approximation; Coulomb; Atomic physics; Scattering cross-section; Coulomb wave function; Electron ionization; Electron; Particle (ecology); Function (biology); Differential (mechanical device); Quantum mechanics; Ion; Scattering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001248533,0.0001030275,0.0001498768,0.00003496609,0.0001817897,0.00009663067,0.0001185061,0.00003577587,0.0001062694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001525774,0.00009472495,0.0002326986,0.000150163,0.00004588279,0.000278471,0.000004035328,0.0002033513,0.000007099567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005409085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008185342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008644144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003500477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993618,0.00001050341,0.000211437,0.00008508251,0.00008056923,0.0002506617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989769,0.00001937184,0.0002110036,0.0001278649,0.0003273098,0.0003375833],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007389549,0.0001739364,0.5825939,0.00002917559,0.0006081872,0.00000802163,0.00153139,0.009808897,0.1115505,0.2196835,0.004824465,0.06911411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008575201,0.0009288595,0.1453724,0.0001023185,0.0007147584,0.00004731195,0.0006236664,0.09957001,0.3993011,0.3158043,0.02721386,0.001746246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8288825,0.000008488447,0.1701576,0.00003709905,0.0004759101,0.00009604661,0.00004472518,0.000003073643,0.0002945629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976764,2.073888e-7,0.0002399832,0.00003270183,0.001883245,0.000003009844,0.00002910517,0.00002124608,0.0001141506],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4372215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3862771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01023634053127786,"score_gpt":0.2733992107536453,"score_spread":0.2631628702223675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}