{"id":"W1998851739","doi":"10.1108/09513570910945633","title":"Accounting and subalternity: enlarging a research space","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Indigenous; Accounting research; Space (punctuation); Consolidation (business); Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Accounting; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Management science; Social science; Engineering; Business; Computer science; Geography; Qualitative research","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01448704,0.000740313,0.0007564463,0.001617462,0.004354911,0.007483068,0.001275111,0.0002961164,0.0004999861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005937567,0.0007378496,0.0002356374,0.002635412,0.0003749648,0.007529235,0.0009202152,0.00242288,0.000554577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004577669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001853439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006407707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008483144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926727,0.0001434123,0.001449373,0.001273117,0.002435782,0.002025561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941379,0.0007467346,0.001425464,0.0007998275,0.002782256,0.0001077721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001861856,0.0006402102,0.8614126,0.0006487245,0.0001717478,0.0001673878,0.0009592789,0.0004106702,0.00358236,0.03505083,0.02407752,0.07269251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003113377,0.0001206341,0.7010713,0.00133683,0.0003731918,0.0007158366,0.009572725,0.01094106,0.0002508314,0.1049226,0.1648116,0.002770096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9702465,0.000491261,0.001138214,0.008973581,0.001050754,0.0005466844,0.000003823456,0.00060568,0.01694351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816898,0.00006706024,0.001493225,0.005834031,0.0105931,0.00001470806,0.00002402782,0.000123498,0.0001605359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1603413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03136363676009571,"score_gpt":0.2955282758750476,"score_spread":0.2641646391149519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}