{"id":"W1998865375","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00028.x","title":"Agriculture's Likely Role in Meeting Canada's Kyoto Commitments*","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Carbon offset; Incentive; Agriculture; Natural resource economics; Emissions trading; Business; Offset (computer science); Kyoto Protocol; Database transaction; Carbon credit; Transaction cost; Agricultural economics; Economics; Finance; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007757668,0.0005337606,0.001291069,0.0007132367,0.0002780354,0.0002735893,0.001002865,0.0002738529,0.0007559147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001654647,0.0005644619,0.0003607245,0.0002668162,0.00009649419,0.001037143,0.0000558215,0.0005940952,0.0002222106],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008764774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009508019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9030915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953469,0.00003133412,0.002462566,0.0006128426,0.00001294224,0.001533388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958691,0.0001210515,0.001662925,0.0003770115,0.0001176898,0.001852194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001616983,0.0002260599,0.5284929,0.0001963198,0.001104783,0.0003240293,0.01538601,0.08006763,0.000127849,0.3165834,0.05156806,0.005761334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002756353,0.0002761207,0.2437813,0.0002042602,0.00005014044,0.001041476,0.006759656,0.0008954558,0.0002309765,0.008956918,0.7329093,0.002138014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9682897,0.002594017,0.000001969282,0.008856787,0.001582971,0.0003181278,0.0009272042,0.00001055099,0.01741869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947752,0.0003401864,0.0003189429,0.001731792,0.001612077,0.00002446936,0.00009308422,0.00005097033,0.001053331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6813413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03268455984169565,"score_gpt":0.164470049630681,"score_spread":0.1317854897889854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}