{"id":"W1998922857","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.04.017","title":"Sex differences in group-joining decisions in social fish","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cichlid; Dominance hierarchy; Dominance (genetics); Preference; Rank (graph theory); Hierarchy; Biology; Demography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Social psychology; Reproductive success; Psychology; Aggression; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Statistics; Sociology; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002242099,0.0001323511,0.0001979668,0.00003322175,0.0001579251,0.0000264787,0.0001904141,0.0001369865,0.0004141811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002410546,0.00005719009,0.00007414442,0.0003678043,0.00005325855,0.0001642582,0.00007474842,0.0002186977,0.00002258865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002869096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000439161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002314439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004745163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988229,0.00006725034,0.0002628081,0.000379597,0.0001644103,0.0003030616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997938,0.0000391439,0.00005583697,0.00003666185,0.00002091875,0.00005369745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004594625,0.000242094,0.9352903,3.683828e-7,8.222294e-7,0.00002543068,0.0005250028,6.617853e-9,0.05008672,0.0001385301,0.00008260232,0.01356215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001157653,0.0003331612,0.996656,0.000012273,0.00000705643,0.000006717534,0.001581296,0.000001712095,0.0009220275,0.0001430525,0.00006306788,0.0001578771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984977,0.00001865853,3.718226e-7,0.0001810516,0.00007550737,0.0001234853,0.00001295575,0.00004496317,0.00104527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995368,0.00001893846,0.00005402401,0.00005588327,0.0001586882,0.00002237455,0.00001746788,0.000001296937,0.0001345513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06136567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4534993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1093216865155361,"score_gpt":0.2671478307005191,"score_spread":0.157826144184983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}