{"id":"W1999058438","doi":"10.1029/2008jg000707","title":"Sensitivity of catchment‐aggregated estimates of soil carbon dioxide efflux to topography under different climatic conditions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Wetland; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Drainage basin; STREAMS; Physical geography; Geology; Ecology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001157347,0.0002333651,0.0002762192,0.0005651189,0.0001967474,0.0006932908,0.0002382537,0.0003362188,0.0003344842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003774782,0.0001783999,0.0003122152,0.0006855113,0.0002170909,0.0003461582,0.0004720602,0.0001753887,0.00006391454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004364211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001914048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02856272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0219105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996269,0.0001355471,0.00002693858,0.0001204332,0.00005498793,0.00003523022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998534,0.0008476939,0.000219563,0.0001878237,0.000162348,0.00004856701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003233711,0.00005500123,0.8568541,0.00003782786,0.0005280745,0.00008585161,0.0003200682,0.1212509,0.008882731,0.0001438373,0.0001191961,0.011399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001592967,0.0000377927,0.8963617,0.000004851339,0.00004872318,0.00004232743,0.0001259435,0.1018156,0.00119052,0.0001855233,0.0001498526,0.00002115303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989551,0.00001811903,0.0007035272,0.000004607778,7.666275e-7,0.000004062598,0.0001736062,0.00001875426,0.0001215216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992263,0.00000930382,0.0003963352,0.000002813804,9.441365e-7,0.000004239077,0.0003341683,0.000002494833,0.0000232925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02856272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05679291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02601863673876601,"score_gpt":0.3012484896237041,"score_spread":0.2752298528849381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}