{"id":"W1999201861","doi":"10.5558/tfc81403-3","title":"Facilitating deliberative governance: Innovations from Nepal's community forestry program – a case study in Karmapunya","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Community forestry; Corporate governance; Deliberative democracy; Citizen journalism; Equity (law); Democracy; Facilitation; Deliberation; Political science; Participatory action research; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Forestry; Public administration; Business; Forest management; Geography; Economic growth; Politics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006947295,0.0003497655,0.0002921258,0.0006811704,0.01210544,0.005127894,0.001801843,0.002682397,0.003065541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008394072,0.0002707051,0.000257115,0.00102341,0.006728299,0.002728052,0.008091503,0.002511264,0.000305547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004252925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006517638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007474398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03091216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992821,0.005406469,0.00009092235,0.000254848,0.0004459472,0.0009807419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921374,0.005748131,0.0003145701,0.0004623583,0.0003128081,0.001024722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001303919,0.001738738,0.01180163,0.0006164069,0.00002506887,0.01891655,0.8384302,0.001070469,0.002076957,0.02196667,0.002902855,0.100324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008284233,0.0006576072,0.01282395,0.0005007755,0.00002429195,0.003104334,0.8783573,0.001445005,0.002392414,0.007313203,0.09324389,0.0000543441],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9575903,0.0002118356,0.002125871,0.002978326,0.00002177801,0.0004774024,0.00002751439,0.00002716035,0.03653982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917696,0.000245646,0.003330721,0.0005460636,0.000006866481,0.0003495157,0.00002624999,0.00001430464,0.003711075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01210544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03674126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0359649777460322,"score_gpt":0.3093262768706166,"score_spread":0.2733612991245844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}