{"id":"W1999202993","doi":"10.1504/ijep.2010.030898","title":"Inter-comparison of the AUSTAL2000 and CALPUFF dispersion models against the Kincaid data set","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environment and Pollution","topic":"Wind and Air Flow Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Philips (Canada); University of Waterloo; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispersion (optics); Quartile; Atmospheric dispersion modeling; Environmental science; Residual; Stack (abstract data type); Atmospheric sciences; Meteorology; Statistics; Air pollution; Mathematics; Geography; Chemistry; Physics; Computer science; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002540873,0.00007283731,0.00008810493,0.00001899776,0.000103268,0.00002153138,0.0004199298,0.00003111074,0.0001068608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001932403,0.00003863688,0.00003569238,0.00002226721,0.0003279763,0.0002862911,0.000563851,0.0001844007,0.000003547533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003262757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004144531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004419977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004210463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992306,0.0000308693,0.0002264759,0.0001014567,0.0003379034,0.00007265263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995763,0.00002553946,0.000205514,0.0001544199,0.000005403502,0.00003282621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002548343,0.0004735949,0.5707126,0.00001092391,0.0002981808,0.000007981167,0.007228218,0.01431386,0.1710028,0.0009464478,0.01717794,0.2175727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001331186,0.0001824191,0.7836555,0.0001053423,0.00012053,0.00009595388,0.001589789,0.04992119,0.004724977,0.002483616,0.1555161,0.0002733484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993752,0.0001693903,0.0004494186,0.004704523,0.0003352556,0.00005357795,0.0000383215,0.000001263987,0.0004962652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991049,0.0003853758,0.0001320563,0.0001366769,0.0001172778,4.460098e-7,0.000003799756,0.000003283813,0.0001161901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2172994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1575566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02359783300067855,"score_gpt":0.2637754665002413,"score_spread":0.2401776334995627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}