{"id":"W1999202993","doi":"10.1504/ijep.2010.030898","title":"Inter-comparison of the AUSTAL2000 and CALPUFF dispersion models against the Kincaid data set","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environment and Pollution","topic":"Wind and Air Flow Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Philips (Canada); University of Waterloo; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispersion (optics); Quartile; Atmospheric dispersion modeling; Environmental science; Residual; Stack (abstract data type); Atmospheric sciences; Meteorology; Statistics; Air pollution; Mathematics; Geography; Chemistry; Physics; Computer science; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004849237,0.0009256631,0.0005341399,0.001431721,0.0006055534,0.001657903,0.001327551,0.0006998665,0.001928984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007937934,0.0002951084,0.0005878466,0.001066438,0.0003230608,0.001360521,0.001210892,0.0009213019,0.001122441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001848515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001233516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1104927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1036316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980966,0.0005089809,0.0001930755,0.0005498369,0.0005432011,0.0001083157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949164,0.001856914,0.0004521872,0.0008380541,0.001771499,0.0001649054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002326071,0.000569111,0.1511495,0.0002204938,0.0005811149,0.0001491138,0.0003881838,0.7477853,0.004488138,0.002754424,0.01244252,0.07714604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001227797,0.0002450683,0.1102159,0.00003350719,0.00004581782,0.00006158387,0.0002504427,0.880155,0.003023475,0.0007560222,0.005008538,0.00008179509],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585927,0.000313736,0.01433922,0.0002828811,0.0001012734,0.0001552031,0.01176125,0.002800729,0.01165308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665048,0.00008198801,0.01249561,0.00005949575,0.00001337129,0.0001025725,0.01840003,0.0002665296,0.002075579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1104927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2196991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02359783300067855,"score_gpt":0.2637754665002413,"score_spread":0.2401776334995627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}