{"id":"W1999215318","doi":"10.1016/s0304-3894(01)00236-9","title":"Risk-based monitored natural attenuation — a case study","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental remediation; Environmental science; Risk analysis (engineering); Natural (archaeology); Remedial action; Risk assessment; Risk management; Contamination; Environmental planning; Waste management; Environmental engineering; Engineering; Computer science; Geology; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007841642,0.0001668163,0.0006856496,0.0005484596,0.0002732993,0.0005429864,0.0005166348,0.00006615029,0.0004807856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002528701,0.0001036821,0.0002782002,0.0006425926,0.00004577486,0.0004453792,0.00004540948,0.0001704845,0.0001335604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000649862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001127351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003971569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001383664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949383,0.001249686,0.001720084,0.0002345899,0.001638385,0.0002189456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956522,0.0007048181,0.002032958,0.0004414838,0.001037577,0.0001309885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005118515,0.002841983,0.5878855,0.00001231789,0.001181155,0.08923458,0.00713395,0.01631264,0.06159233,0.00001790143,0.01414299,0.2145262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02611302,0.00765699,0.6925671,0.0001959348,0.004054705,0.0693941,0.09111624,0.00923654,0.05773386,0.02364029,0.01576727,0.002523986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960845,0.0001539028,0.001090851,0.0007426863,0.001698954,0.0001617785,0.00001487117,0.00001266135,0.00003985922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983056,0.00005932609,0.0007443308,0.00006037381,0.0005914109,0.000002621118,0.000001020634,0.00001178752,0.0002235349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2120022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5264265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06122931539410535,"score_gpt":0.3811549006457698,"score_spread":0.3199255852516644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}