{"id":"W1999535358","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2010/v13i3a2691","title":"Rethinking Volks V Robinson: The Implications of Applying a \"Contextaulised Choice Model\" to Prospective South African Domestic Partnerships Legislation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Sine qua non; Law; Jurisprudence; General partnership; Duty; Legislation; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03263548,0.0004910298,0.000781677,0.001256946,0.007437537,0.01026302,0.004388812,0.01421325,0.004035445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03519996,0.0006145047,0.0009513923,0.001099035,0.0433796,0.01076412,0.009371371,0.01462207,0.0004123032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01559195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02821361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07617446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09868291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9731151,0.01593842,0.0006733352,0.002518304,0.005485428,0.002269457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790819,0.01739224,0.0007137043,0.0009677421,0.001106705,0.0007377859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003424293,0.000002891761,0.00005912843,0.00001002316,0.000001417815,0.0000612346,0.002357114,0.0001016806,0.00002802164,0.9956513,0.0009775031,0.000746272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009725487,0.00009468161,0.0007538392,0.0005294564,0.00003844545,0.0002084034,0.008543824,0.003295633,0.0006962694,0.8544787,0.1311619,0.0001015135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1033883,0.005462347,0.037574,0.4787263,0.002034167,0.0004670304,0.0001476084,0.0001102619,0.37209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9146127,0.001277061,0.007640332,0.05875945,0.0003584016,0.0002407792,0.00001759517,0.00004673754,0.01704685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07617446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.172595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05935593146852806,"score_gpt":0.3419609162935602,"score_spread":0.2826049848250321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}