{"id":"W1999706565","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064228","title":"“Making Public Law, ‘Public’: An Analysis of the Quebec Reference Case and its Significance for Comparative Constitutional Analysis”","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scrutiny; Political science; Supreme court; Politics; Legal profession; Public law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Legal opinion; Constitutional law; Democracy; Subject (documents); Private law; Black letter law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002475746,0.0001001576,0.0003082987,0.0003030333,0.001187816,0.0005382409,0.0002476051,0.00005113709,0.0007407055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006949568,0.00009605441,0.00012727,0.0006288421,0.002384792,0.0006814359,0.0000101454,0.00008943192,0.000003543727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001966457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002856457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2532054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987817,0.0002165511,0.0002637187,0.0002786834,0.00029613,0.0001632283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989897,0.00019344,0.0001509674,0.000107615,0.0004369398,0.0001213162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002563351,0.00006349833,0.0005853307,0.000002315655,0.0009486715,0.000004015869,0.01614252,0.00006430587,0.00001834391,0.981121,0.00007157736,0.0009527612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009638425,0.000265709,0.03245111,0.00003071127,0.002010702,0.00002615439,0.03486248,0.01914591,0.00002503274,0.0106219,0.8989508,0.000645696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9409108,0.0002319113,0.0004548072,0.0015273,0.0001108027,0.000273518,0.0007913925,0.00001839316,0.05568105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977407,0.00000683131,0.00005145374,0.0002367624,0.00005740995,0.00003497798,0.00005606216,0.000001448563,0.001814299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9135841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1375669828113801,"score_gpt":0.3561090799552209,"score_spread":0.2185420971438408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}