{"id":"W1999706565","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064228","title":"“Making Public Law, ‘Public’: An Analysis of the Quebec Reference Case and its Significance for Comparative Constitutional Analysis”","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scrutiny; Political science; Supreme court; Politics; Legal profession; Public law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Legal opinion; Constitutional law; Democracy; Subject (documents); Private law; Black letter law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005834637,0.0005771734,0.0007528734,0.00568623,0.03687313,0.01492944,0.004468382,0.009347064,0.01476329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01178847,0.0004324519,0.0006835561,0.009303669,0.03094807,0.007254634,0.004078634,0.005907139,0.0006173198],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1457238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08520272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9752287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889416,0.004057694,0.00008951534,0.0005641623,0.002568312,0.003778873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949461,0.002320414,0.0002166424,0.0002963055,0.001882058,0.0003384789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006771831,0.00001101866,0.0002477391,0.00002395288,0.000004309925,0.0002162719,0.005827623,0.0001381868,0.00003209085,0.9806653,0.009955907,0.002870823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000622104,0.00005500204,0.0174481,0.0012387,0.0001021053,0.0004344413,0.07236792,0.003630362,0.0005502799,0.3188733,0.5850574,0.0001802397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0561029,0.01397518,0.003959959,0.06024625,0.0003524228,0.0001352365,0.0003427294,0.0000574447,0.8648279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9232261,0.003735006,0.00142792,0.009338125,0.000223695,0.0001863968,0.0001814449,0.00006566048,0.06161564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1457238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1375669828113801,"score_gpt":0.3561090799552209,"score_spread":0.2185420971438408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}