{"id":"W1999736784","doi":"10.1289/ehp.6224","title":"Risk management and precaution: insights on the cautious use of evidence.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Health Perspectives","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"False positive paradox; False positives and false negatives; Precautionary principle; Dilemma; Predictive value; Risk management; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk assessment; Value (mathematics); Actuarial science; Medicine; Computer science; Business; Computer security; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005539001,0.00008963409,0.000100598,0.00005464046,0.0008279482,0.00003022132,0.00007800349,0.00002889785,0.0004860177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005527287,0.00006059491,0.00003744707,0.00009159608,0.0005234205,0.0001735184,0.00003436606,0.0001021956,0.00003993139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004188128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002002658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008464905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003194427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983343,0.0007402967,0.0001524949,0.0002425082,0.0003410994,0.000189261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999454,0.0001544271,0.0001129082,0.0001813394,0.000004174896,0.00009317666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003817026,0.000532957,0.008330232,0.0000283373,0.00006424489,0.000002550723,0.2669446,0.0000711411,0.00001076341,0.7026768,0.004484804,0.01681548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002828999,0.0003328582,0.2607035,0.00008025081,0.00002278324,6.67661e-7,0.2793095,0.00002055347,0.00002110362,0.003760373,0.4553025,0.0001630007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9592413,0.005307879,0.000355649,0.007969949,0.0002206565,0.001778945,0.00001279935,0.00005305792,0.02505979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939747,0.05586981,0.0004002635,0.0003948935,0.0000244822,0.0000312832,5.671051e-7,0.000005682266,0.003526006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6989164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6367992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09271535023228655,"score_gpt":0.3404477019111088,"score_spread":0.2477323516788223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}