{"id":"W1999793317","doi":"10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1021","title":"Readers guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 3. Analytical strategies to reduce confounding","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Confounding; Logistic regression; Proportional hazards model; Outcome (game theory); Critical appraisal; Econometrics; Statistics; Selection bias; Cohort; Propensity score matching; Cohort study; Medicine; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05279258,0.003345456,0.005843536,0.01844316,0.00120087,0.004183982,0.007386298,0.008215259,0.125581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3023099,0.004184824,0.005500177,0.01266147,0.003151214,0.004621481,0.003837859,0.007501878,0.09891964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002537017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01309201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007429339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01597407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9444337,0.02822048,0.01559719,0.001158413,0.009957024,0.0006330833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5841679,0.2557407,0.02878412,0.009699657,0.1178076,0.003800002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001366597,0.00005223414,0.0001225312,0.01438231,0.0001542113,0.0001100967,0.0003095517,0.0002253894,0.0004600102,0.001146875,0.9142967,0.06860356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009726789,0.0001287047,0.002516843,0.03069077,0.0004493229,0.0005350793,0.0004864222,0.001392591,0.0008634184,0.01494137,0.9467284,0.000294474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001340464,0.1619053,0.2754346,0.2048851,0.06420733,0.104798,0.09383045,0.02425953,0.0693393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003246736,0.07589317,0.650937,0.04646441,0.02046131,0.1068368,0.01450443,0.002837159,0.07881908],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9472074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4201101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6567723379983404,"score_gpt":0.6372476161833807,"score_spread":0.01952472181495979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}