{"id":"W1999793317","doi":"10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1021","title":"Readers guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 3. Analytical strategies to reduce confounding","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Confounding; Logistic regression; Proportional hazards model; Outcome (game theory); Critical appraisal; Econometrics; Statistics; Selection bias; Cohort; Propensity score matching; Cohort study; Medicine; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0239696,0.0005324482,0.005926539,0.0009150306,0.0001339489,0.0001450375,0.0006627906,0.0004214528,0.0003486554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05644385,0.0006252369,0.0005329649,0.0005687223,0.0002126672,0.0003250365,0.0001916768,0.000374964,0.004269883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001070368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001126279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002771681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006437799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9863319,0.0005602311,0.01097055,0.001155259,0.0002320008,0.0007500396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870907,0.008550867,0.002399864,0.00113669,0.0002528921,0.0005689831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001206322,0.00009921516,0.00009233519,0.02120129,0.001561198,0.000006616214,0.002098763,0.0001333833,2.943578e-8,0.3223586,0.6365227,0.0159138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001372359,0.0000963335,0.00004549688,0.005315273,0.0002205836,0.00002046189,0.004580982,0.00008191542,5.098951e-8,0.0003410812,0.9885616,0.0005989686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003428255,0.9467638,0.002728773,0.02729947,0.002377877,0.002860081,0.0004998312,0.00006516004,0.01737075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000757274,0.9718559,0.01853751,0.003255599,0.00332683,0.000980397,0.00007033841,0.0001301299,0.001767513],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.352039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6567723379983404,"score_gpt":0.6372476161833807,"score_spread":0.01952472181495979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}