{"id":"W1999794310","doi":"10.1139/x03-258","title":"Optimal stand density: a solution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Maximum density; Mathematics; Canopy; Thinning; Statistics; Forestry; Botany; Thermodynamics; Physics; Biology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008712909,0.001129282,0.001415212,0.001291164,0.0008773554,0.001911663,0.001740293,0.003038898,0.01342483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004191279,0.0009075186,0.0008970906,0.001137565,0.0008730149,0.002236415,0.001546045,0.001870203,0.001267235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00227021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003171143,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005650063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006030235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994831,0.0001445691,0.00002269441,0.0001687291,0.00009582626,0.00008508638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990496,0.0005263438,0.00008144957,0.00003630865,0.0002346724,0.00007169374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006904851,0.000193369,0.002257976,0.000622229,0.00009072786,0.0002953487,0.0002011866,0.5191281,0.001108772,0.3142202,0.02783189,0.1339811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007436504,0.0001216196,0.00136875,0.00026974,0.00005511004,0.000269315,0.0003613152,0.5698097,0.0004030143,0.4014307,0.02578524,0.00005111015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03886319,0.006153145,0.8460229,0.01298315,0.0005652361,0.0002639578,0.001002358,0.0003784548,0.09376755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4368718,0.005980704,0.5143295,0.001554893,0.0008617952,0.0006237376,0.0008867069,0.000357328,0.03853351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01342483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04491055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03020005776982701,"score_gpt":0.2832526464457616,"score_spread":0.2530525886759346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}