{"id":"W1999823870","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01758.x","title":"Empirical comparison of density estimators for large carnivores","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Carnivore; Mark and recapture; Ursus; Estimator; Range (aeronautics); Sampling (signal processing); Population density; Wildlife; Statistics; Distance sampling; Abundance (ecology); Population; Wildlife management; Camera trap; Abundance estimation; Home range; Ecology; Boundary (topology); Geography; Density estimation; Habitat; Biology; Mathematics; Computer science; Predation; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000376218,0.00006430916,0.0002794125,0.00003702565,0.00007641071,0.000002643025,0.0001334435,0.0001239308,0.0002359587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006502034,0.0000562036,0.00006477841,0.0000715812,0.00006598575,0.00005184944,0.00002548175,0.0001331423,0.00002283133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006619779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002620307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001604355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008710276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992613,0.00002217091,0.0003728145,0.00008694964,0.00009104978,0.0001656912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993042,0.0001702508,0.0003851455,0.0000682738,0.00001989433,0.00005218943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002286446,0.0002637028,0.9781967,0.000002621405,0.00001444315,0.000002189559,0.0002841504,0.00113403,0.0007972678,0.0008545241,0.01736319,0.0008584934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006202267,0.0005050452,0.9884492,0.000001349106,0.00003165317,0.00001108544,0.00009750122,0.0008224921,0.001309889,0.00625717,0.001842174,0.0000521686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955161,0.000006094476,0.001950835,0.001148173,0.0001343322,0.000109943,9.635243e-7,0.000004514383,0.001129016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943089,0.00000150074,0.004492124,0.001129172,0.00004327614,0.000002174784,0.000001241162,0.00000287402,0.00001875954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01552102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2583582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01790189788891638,"score_gpt":0.2985890379599347,"score_spread":0.2806871400710184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}