{"id":"W1999823870","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01758.x","title":"Empirical comparison of density estimators for large carnivores","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Carnivore; Mark and recapture; Ursus; Estimator; Range (aeronautics); Sampling (signal processing); Population density; Wildlife; Statistics; Distance sampling; Abundance (ecology); Population; Wildlife management; Camera trap; Abundance estimation; Home range; Ecology; Boundary (topology); Geography; Density estimation; Habitat; Biology; Mathematics; Computer science; Predation; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02248009,0.0003550014,0.0004117309,0.001474266,0.0002016017,0.0005934024,0.0007702037,0.0004956945,0.001349803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07306933,0.0002244806,0.0004097426,0.0006831207,0.0005129456,0.001008596,0.001055335,0.0005038668,0.0002425138],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005270989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002379999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001558756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001258672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952117,0.003208156,0.000282123,0.0006735161,0.000529066,0.00009551488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8636472,0.1186365,0.00536421,0.006541093,0.005216437,0.0005945018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001271414,0.000208073,0.7780679,0.0003076965,0.0009839174,0.0001364363,0.000893305,0.06878461,0.001973541,0.004600812,0.001712669,0.1410596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001238304,0.0008963888,0.6238813,0.0001696729,0.0002101184,0.0007282646,0.0006922844,0.3622908,0.002619961,0.005567844,0.002705456,0.0001141377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662274,0.001225734,0.03067574,0.0000882198,0.00002223673,0.00004590986,0.0003813846,0.0000880668,0.001245383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902683,0.0001713056,0.008510892,0.00002108004,0.00001632672,0.00003816986,0.0007544325,0.00001909182,0.0002004036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02248009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1188875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01790189788891638,"score_gpt":0.2985890379599347,"score_spread":0.2806871400710184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}