{"id":"W1999886794","doi":"10.3390/su5051960","title":"Accounting for the Ecological Footprint of Materials in Consumer Goods at the Urban Scale","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainability","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada; European Commission","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Carbon footprint; Life-cycle assessment; Municipal solid waste; Environmental economics; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Scale (ratio); Renewable energy; Greenhouse gas; Goods and services; Energy consumption; Industrial ecology; Business; Production (economics); Sustainability; Ecology; Waste management; Engineering; Geography; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001322262,0.0009333143,0.0004458121,0.003720729,0.000536744,0.002775317,0.0007021072,0.0005686968,0.004194354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002876317,0.0003474713,0.001230773,0.008594627,0.0007332863,0.003292577,0.001594018,0.0008137767,0.0007875687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001994564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001504835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02220672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04482212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987735,0.000316746,0.00007487553,0.0001284866,0.000605802,0.0001005423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979129,0.0006513516,0.0003386824,0.0004224566,0.0006218318,0.00005277521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001384452,0.000351383,0.334415,0.001397401,0.0009039783,0.000458285,0.001501089,0.2384697,0.0127957,0.09220755,0.00561772,0.3117438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002544107,0.0003971135,0.4507486,0.001025639,0.0007783094,0.0005996657,0.006271972,0.262499,0.02689096,0.1215354,0.1290189,0.0002090737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6294615,0.004782743,0.257931,0.001066071,0.0001692403,0.0004745552,0.006820044,0.0005443963,0.09875052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9254621,0.001768959,0.0633046,0.0001217248,0.00002481377,0.0002618395,0.00255349,0.0001508164,0.006351636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02220672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04415494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007748191456060439,"score_gpt":0.2488593354495448,"score_spread":0.2411111439934844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}