{"id":"W1999911724","doi":"10.4319/lo.2001.46.4.0935","title":"Use of size spectra and empirical models to evaluate trophic relationships in streams","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Limnology and Oceanography","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Trophic level; Algae; STREAMS; Nutrient; Invertebrate; Ecology; Primary producers; Environmental science; Chlorophyll a; Periphyton; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Phosphorus; Phytoplankton; Botany; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003824099,0.0005300263,0.0002640515,0.00126404,0.0003453029,0.0008890353,0.0008072466,0.0005705584,0.0008438958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02112904,0.0003158034,0.0003338197,0.0004973069,0.0005808771,0.001128292,0.0005982504,0.0004074525,0.0001369422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001946123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007539877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03642892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02866924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993737,0.0004085277,0.00002658362,0.00007763151,0.00006553702,0.00004805374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915363,0.00665187,0.0008764009,0.0002830688,0.0004526689,0.0001996257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001827501,0.0001178685,0.32993,0.00003292649,0.0001307853,0.0001256354,0.0001884438,0.6406239,0.0003638502,0.005172386,0.0006153523,0.02251614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001020351,0.00002817152,0.01699186,0.000006493244,0.0000102437,0.00003419395,0.00004775949,0.9800035,0.00007293631,0.002613658,0.0001751708,0.000005719632],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710101,0.0002227944,0.02671098,0.0001608267,0.000005222785,0.0000271156,0.0001508971,0.0001360163,0.001576102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934875,0.0001042681,0.005782666,0.00002017193,0.000007010321,0.00003205932,0.0001983236,0.00002199888,0.0003460847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03642892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07243377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06303123794061676,"score_gpt":0.2614552502228716,"score_spread":0.1984240122822548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}