{"id":"W2000049533","doi":"10.1007/s00199-003-0387-y","title":"Bilateral bargaining, unverifiable quality, and options to return","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Microeconomics; Economics; Uniqueness; Negotiation; Bargaining problem; Markov perfect equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Quality (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Verifiable secret sharing; Public finance; Ex-ante; Game theory; Nash equilibrium; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01442663,0.0006445801,0.001730543,0.001390793,0.002303683,0.009438327,0.001939741,0.004399094,0.01945023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05450984,0.0004927703,0.000931363,0.002184896,0.009628949,0.01265962,0.00314042,0.006476645,0.00064239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004523995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003664501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00566872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005109381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934361,0.002760917,0.0002818269,0.0008246739,0.001473751,0.001222752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687983,0.02049716,0.005283688,0.001989027,0.00192378,0.001507949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002585929,0.00001566013,0.0004022895,0.00001619726,0.00001217366,0.00001807055,0.00009031306,0.003284896,0.00003289881,0.99225,0.0005555673,0.003296108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000981525,0.000004104941,0.0001532673,0.000009118245,0.000004555183,0.00000862069,0.00004866527,0.002471378,0.00001469191,0.9968132,0.0004585436,0.000003867062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2499579,0.008031835,0.3727729,0.04297115,0.0005971562,0.0001647306,0.0004349827,0.0001380848,0.3249312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98261,0.00118272,0.005126145,0.0006213259,0.0002816163,0.00004827697,0.00004635707,0.0000229105,0.01006055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01945023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07629627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03965660945296697,"score_gpt":0.2482684732069473,"score_spread":0.2086118637539803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}