{"id":"W2000105024","doi":"10.1115/1.4001707","title":"Quantitative Fault Tolerant Control Design for a Leaking Hydraulic Actuator","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control","topic":"Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Control theory (sociology); Actuator; Plant; Hydraulic cylinder; Robustness (evolution); Quantitative feedback theory; Parametric statistics; Position tracking; Hydraulic machinery; Control engineering; Engineering; Robust control; Computer science; Control system; Control (management); Mechanical engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003278397,0.0002812124,0.0008416402,0.000175466,0.0001080091,0.0001352637,0.0002018289,0.0001478396,0.0000048393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003076449,0.0002160951,0.0001948981,0.00007779111,0.00003438769,0.0002027403,0.000003966908,0.0003038119,0.00000527027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001226099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009223683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000182258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003164007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976546,0.0001655406,0.00104041,0.0001504511,0.0006416006,0.0003474431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981357,0.0004780802,0.0004780781,0.000173458,0.0005445321,0.0001901615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001265173,0.0001640273,0.0006266715,0.001551994,0.004061581,0.00004983889,0.003322823,0.1200413,0.8464203,0.001134924,0.002012847,0.01934858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006779101,0.0004739336,0.0003330373,0.0004994159,0.0002815646,0.0002291038,0.0006689611,0.9875335,0.0001238449,0.00007858974,0.002711539,0.0002873705],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08880233,0.00353168,0.9028276,0.0001800808,0.003116557,0.001292867,0.00001600187,0.00005659707,0.0001762425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984791,0.00002307419,0.0009490335,0.00004823693,0.0003390279,0.00009337936,5.628046e-7,0.00004571082,0.00002189843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9096767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8812101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02337814640941479,"score_gpt":0.2340309329591472,"score_spread":0.2106527865497324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}