{"id":"W2000125285","doi":"10.2118/126452-ms","title":"Fracture Mechanics Interpretation of Leak-Off Tests","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Drilling and Well Engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Borehole; Leak; Lost circulation; Fracture (geology); Mechanics; Stress (linguistics); Point (geometry); Ultimate tensile strength; Interpretation (philosophy); Fracture mechanics; Geotechnical engineering; Geology; Petroleum engineering; Materials science; Structural engineering; Drilling; Drilling fluid; Engineering; Computer science; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Physics; Composite material; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005087203,0.000774627,0.0005859972,0.0007913791,0.0004451446,0.001066177,0.001360228,0.001027995,0.004418154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002193612,0.0002914667,0.0004951854,0.0002021709,0.00107243,0.001537809,0.0008297948,0.0008203064,0.000478303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007978775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000556863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003030825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001584776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995593,0.0000622253,0.00001931374,0.00005468009,0.000233962,0.000070587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991421,0.0002035961,0.00008882213,0.0001416391,0.0003882463,0.00003554866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000408335,0.0001990848,0.01424078,0.0001804092,0.00003667497,0.002407485,0.0004986272,0.7411059,0.08928668,0.09540007,0.002886486,0.05334958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009191632,0.00008957571,0.002540821,0.000019448,0.000008358715,0.0002706395,0.00008472847,0.9630422,0.0108268,0.02172074,0.001355477,0.00003202341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3523569,0.0001665018,0.6167963,0.0003519351,0.0001352575,0.0001115641,0.0003536318,0.0009902028,0.02873782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878434,0.00006574458,0.006398557,0.00003937535,0.00001706575,0.00003008625,0.00008728135,0.0001010007,0.005417386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004418154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01478022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003077755597048459,"score_gpt":0.1888933582484476,"score_spread":0.1858156026513992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}