{"id":"W2000157702","doi":"10.1016/j.jat.2013.11.008","title":"<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" altimg=\"si1.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math> norm inequalities for analytic functions revisited","year":2013,"lang":"lv","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Approximation Theory","topic":"Analytic and geometric function theory","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Scroll; Regular polygon; Algorithm; Geometry; Theology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001069417,0.0007992485,0.0008039108,0.001972109,0.0008614049,0.004804465,0.002395381,0.001224661,0.3752542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004370564,0.0005527926,0.0007380835,0.003534259,0.0007705358,0.006035044,0.001328709,0.002980265,0.1909486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001877471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001058722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007740323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008569464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993923,0.0001444132,0.00005003047,0.00009350025,0.0002671883,0.00005258542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979254,0.0006689605,0.0001364606,0.0003756173,0.0007552177,0.0001383603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006616076,0.00002779007,0.0001635233,0.000236568,0.00001142512,0.00006109459,0.0001419314,0.000459663,0.001214407,0.2135186,0.7238839,0.06021492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001929975,0.00001592663,0.0007527403,0.00008369538,0.000009517848,0.0001767622,0.0001074111,0.0044476,0.003566924,0.1138706,0.8769144,0.00003505438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002823205,0.001949512,0.2182334,0.02403012,0.003709706,0.0001251704,0.02530959,0.01530581,0.7085135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06677856,0.005593096,0.2035995,0.005671852,0.002553642,0.0003744351,0.03463333,0.03080512,0.6499904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3752542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.891124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02309065033405771,"score_gpt":0.253936305179179,"score_spread":0.2308456548451213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}