{"id":"W2000166164","doi":"10.1016/j.strusafe.2007.09.007","title":"Application of cumulative prospect theory: Implied seismic design preference","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Structural Safety","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cumulative prospect theory; Weighting; Prospect theory; Preference; Bounded rationality; Rationality; Expected utility hypothesis; Seismic analysis; Econometrics; Seismic risk; Sensitivity (control systems); Computer science; Economics; Engineering; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Structural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006073758,0.001201377,0.001534821,0.001386929,0.0005936963,0.002739477,0.001696239,0.002567399,0.0104501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04650964,0.00060812,0.000951106,0.001877266,0.002140044,0.004833592,0.001590784,0.002937023,0.0003213578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001509834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001295138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001612157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972208,0.001981165,0.00007978144,0.0002537319,0.0003440458,0.0001205413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.958894,0.0369691,0.001377399,0.00135947,0.0009544074,0.0004456039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001806548,0.0001816369,0.002072004,0.000178002,0.0001020511,0.0001527772,0.0002631283,0.1326739,0.0003528391,0.8396337,0.001275355,0.02293399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003931376,0.00005564565,0.0005870991,0.00002266291,0.00003995046,0.00004454038,0.00006927274,0.2753748,0.0001117409,0.7231654,0.0004666784,0.00002290963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1973402,0.0007883622,0.772644,0.003795045,0.0001341472,0.0000966743,0.0002652374,0.00008889379,0.02484737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955255,0.0007873948,0.03955262,0.0001709972,0.0001596443,0.00009928352,0.0001203061,0.00001830812,0.003836435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03495908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1310299700131957,"score_gpt":0.399559374547294,"score_spread":0.2685294045340982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}