{"id":"W2000340237","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.09.044","title":"Mitral Repair Versus Replacement for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Annals of Thoracic Surgery","topic":"Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Toronto General Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Hazard ratio; Mitral valve repair; Cardiology; Mitral regurgitation; Cardiogenic shock; Internal medicine; Surgery; Mitral valve replacement; Comorbidity; Survival analysis; Proportional hazards model; Mitral valve; Survival rate; Confidence interval; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003263079,0.0004807092,0.002433595,0.0004910193,0.0003143364,0.0009623735,0.0005198809,0.001171768,0.008268137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008647619,0.0002594849,0.002018041,0.0003642491,0.0007955893,0.001111238,0.0004723694,0.00188062,0.0006057044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004180743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006525217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002699837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001254347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984764,0.0008156914,0.0002202048,0.0001710921,0.0001088521,0.0002076178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928882,0.005317424,0.0007467045,0.0001771919,0.0001080616,0.0007624372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.6279892,0.002519676,0.03091544,0.005405747,0.006073698,0.001341408,0.0005075046,0.00164021,0.006455638,0.005306671,0.004285032,0.3075598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.2164869,0.3476958,0.3274338,0.004483468,0.02763682,0.01008863,0.002938532,0.00706532,0.00539981,0.02144607,0.02898469,0.0003403001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8989713,0.07663937,0.001011427,0.007615389,0.005495256,0.0001123646,0.0003560787,0.00003220845,0.009766558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843451,0.008874441,0.0005375107,0.001425922,0.00371209,0.00003468694,0.0001143833,0.000007288697,0.0009484991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008268137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02765971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.127422691301965,"score_gpt":0.4579570219200846,"score_spread":0.3305343306181195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}