{"id":"W2000422052","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2013.10.001","title":"Comparative life cycle assessments: The case of paper and digital media","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Recycling and Waste Management Techniques","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Context (archaeology); Information and Communications Technology; Product (mathematics); Footprint; Ecological footprint; Computer science; Environmental impact assessment; Digital media; Consumption (sociology); Environmental economics; Business; Sustainability; Production (economics); World Wide Web; Mathematics; Economics; Political science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007166327,0.0008445699,0.0008226721,0.009505779,0.0007462999,0.002869604,0.001783513,0.001367788,0.00634959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01155491,0.00024383,0.001569036,0.007152352,0.000640458,0.003943383,0.00111403,0.0008420115,0.0005392432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00431143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002505115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01196858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02268077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964066,0.00162035,0.0001994027,0.0002130942,0.001301476,0.000258992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868194,0.008738071,0.0007141071,0.000431329,0.003106871,0.000190343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002517435,0.001102317,0.01226753,0.01514065,0.001052914,0.000735969,0.002440578,0.01902104,0.01303392,0.04274526,0.009238381,0.8807041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002824321,0.01100861,0.1124106,0.01609127,0.004088401,0.002297777,0.02319085,0.02785463,0.08453844,0.08227673,0.6354897,0.0004706029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3285685,0.4807256,0.02831392,0.003370011,0.0004860636,0.0008371151,0.004595246,0.0001497105,0.1529538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7277427,0.2327991,0.02144127,0.000709522,0.0001429292,0.000450239,0.001755098,0.00009242812,0.01486662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01196858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03789961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01800357283468219,"score_gpt":0.336627638584139,"score_spread":0.3186240657494568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}