{"id":"W2000468509","doi":"10.1093/treephys/20.5-6.323","title":"Light absorption and bole volume growth of individual Douglas-fir trees","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tree Physiology","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Forest Service","keywords":"Competition (biology); Tree (set theory); Douglas fir; Photosynthetically active radiation; Mathematics; Canopy; Basal area; Growth rate; Growth model; Diameter at breast height; Absorption (acoustics); Leaf area index; Crown (dentistry); Botany; Atmospheric sciences; Ecology; Biology; Photosynthesis; Geology; Physics; Geometry; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003292839,0.0002560001,0.0001756496,0.000390179,0.0001709716,0.0003978122,0.0003050734,0.0001851281,0.0004177639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007622401,0.0002123102,0.0002801367,0.0004208433,0.0001935425,0.0002742582,0.0001580379,0.0002227162,0.0001378782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001041182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004162224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05980237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1006447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998691,0.00001874959,0.000006796903,0.00005102897,0.00003284977,0.00002143692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996474,0.0001535195,0.0000725776,0.00004887126,0.00004870655,0.00002897223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000267276,0.0001223691,0.7457185,0.00006693532,0.0001434788,0.0001207036,0.0002949581,0.1441523,0.09127038,0.0005395411,0.0001752583,0.01712833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008078527,0.00005824904,0.8902926,0.000003599047,0.00002809719,0.00006794532,0.00003825567,0.1042291,0.004846793,0.000164496,0.000249459,0.00001341114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986927,0.00002307452,0.000788516,0.000002505056,6.087391e-7,0.000002683256,0.0002148854,0.00002047925,0.000254626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987172,0.00002074271,0.0007357377,0.000001927129,3.843107e-7,0.000005037739,0.0003184905,0.000006700769,0.0001938748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05980237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1189086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005405278777955502,"score_gpt":0.192960509414862,"score_spread":0.1875552306369065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}