{"id":"W2000550074","doi":"10.3138/jvme.38.2.135","title":"Training Students to Appraise the Quality of Scientific Literature","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Veterinary Medical Education","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Quality (philosophy); Medical education; Objectivity (philosophy); Scientific literature; Test (biology); Psychology; Quality assessment; Medicine; Pathology; Pedagogy; External quality assessment","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0284591,0.0005796863,0.001134559,0.004075383,0.001015823,0.003007302,0.001056126,0.002005624,0.00502949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1101467,0.0004704588,0.0008573826,0.001626508,0.001479374,0.002901672,0.003090913,0.002105159,0.002267753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001313762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006152473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005314669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009534968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884516,0.004854754,0.001927673,0.000619824,0.003143343,0.001002957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8395158,0.07335418,0.03049665,0.006304139,0.0374168,0.0129124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006015465,0.004044985,0.173995,0.003256391,0.0001101971,0.0005973179,0.02473298,0.0007193704,0.01118396,0.001154345,0.02328269,0.7563211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011475,0.01530843,0.6501425,0.009931997,0.0003912176,0.01071821,0.05105375,0.005923482,0.0206888,0.01619319,0.2179154,0.0005856203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9012929,0.009607007,0.03275252,0.02480277,0.001272234,0.004538931,0.0003267966,0.001062744,0.02434408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8126896,0.008085543,0.160332,0.005845123,0.0006839978,0.00421819,0.0003581058,0.00008378627,0.007703582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1505079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6255618417447222,"score_gpt":0.6544753167113335,"score_spread":0.02891347496661134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}