{"id":"W2000556665","doi":"10.1109/ifsa-nafips.2013.6608567","title":"Quantitative and qualitative risk in EPCM projects using fuzzy set theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy set; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Risk management; Representation (politics); Defuzzification; Risk analysis (engineering); Data mining; Fuzzy number; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006787286,0.001063941,0.0008097232,0.004509656,0.001007882,0.0037035,0.00120519,0.001008583,0.001773806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008949278,0.0004142608,0.00201728,0.002800288,0.001684856,0.002758669,0.001733525,0.001352363,0.0001534678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003160326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00195157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005435995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003732786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938636,0.003366119,0.0003522997,0.0003375175,0.001867325,0.0002130829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954582,0.003234017,0.0004291656,0.0001583125,0.0006366094,0.00008360291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002101832,0.0002006311,0.005606689,0.0004764247,0.0001428978,0.0004730626,0.002298366,0.6670127,0.006864832,0.1888122,0.0009304053,0.1269717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000221949,0.0001530496,0.002239209,0.0002057042,0.00006087446,0.0001562563,0.001035115,0.9126583,0.002859743,0.07827524,0.002253297,0.0000811272],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03776456,0.0003891384,0.9542262,0.0002345629,0.00003093295,0.0002031371,0.00005630299,0.00006007384,0.007035096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6852297,0.0006901963,0.3115784,0.00004399628,0.00003803916,0.0003960922,0.00008296965,0.00002068615,0.001920006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006787286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03589505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4591505871589708,"score_gpt":0.544240917563822,"score_spread":0.08509033040485114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}