{"id":"W2000563130","doi":"10.1375/jdmr.4.2.27","title":"A Selective Critical but Constructive Desktop Appraisal of the<i>American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA 6)</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Disability Management","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Critical appraisal; Criticism; Jurisdiction; Perspective (graphical); Consistency (knowledge bases); Constructive criticism; Association (psychology); International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Rehabilitation; Computer science; Law; Alternative medicine; Process (computing); Psychotherapist; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02823079,0.0001236032,0.000560349,0.0001429573,0.00006833546,0.00003850822,0.0007366292,0.00005330918,0.0001894473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01496154,0.0001009608,0.0002608195,0.0002151155,0.0002542239,0.0002146816,0.0001125844,0.0001977077,0.00002394923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002296214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002090273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002295545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007946957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938848,0.0008730706,0.003383412,0.0002378905,0.001429804,0.000191036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934169,0.001496663,0.003400595,0.0002977366,0.001280144,0.0001079477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004626501,0.002890196,0.6260453,0.0002107512,0.002071807,0.000002512719,0.006454975,0.006117709,0.00003641669,0.3065221,0.02581707,0.02336843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001002572,0.0003163355,0.9627895,0.0001520149,0.00007489578,0.00001296041,0.003356548,0.002834307,0.00009146459,0.02771354,0.001533502,0.0001223728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8497823,0.000099198,0.002351929,0.1436919,0.001158507,0.0006458309,0.0001051302,0.000004689438,0.00216042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954185,0.00002491688,0.001056941,0.00314193,0.0003047987,0.00002453551,0.000002438568,0.00000611733,0.00001979909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3367442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1267371259906943,"score_gpt":0.4708288345124885,"score_spread":0.3440917085217942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}