{"id":"W2000565159","doi":"10.1139/x06-021","title":"Restoration of floral diversity through plantations on abandoned agricultural land","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Understory; Afforestation; Species richness; Agroforestry; Species diversity; Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Ecology; Plant community; Context (archaeology); Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Environmental science; Forestry; Canopy; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000256927,0.0001133688,0.0001578406,0.000305067,0.0004037133,0.0002533433,0.0002216006,0.00007470198,0.0004590334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005810166,0.00006823209,0.0001230744,0.0002322048,0.0004191,0.000174804,0.00030258,0.0001485565,0.00005997737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005365325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003788681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008959268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04965777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998662,0.00003679459,0.000005654711,0.00002095929,0.00002489754,0.00004548993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996651,0.00005754855,0.0001182716,0.00003722236,0.00004328493,0.00007858142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001078365,0.0004549333,0.8340883,0.00008229945,0.0001077403,0.0009368072,0.002274199,0.001124334,0.1003041,0.0002595724,0.0002251669,0.05906407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008046046,0.0004204462,0.9969945,0.000003559898,0.00001313594,0.0001758163,0.0003962549,0.0002886624,0.001229643,0.00005319626,0.000413849,0.000002921236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998845,0.000008609859,0.00001575482,0.000001892771,2.2069e-7,8.715383e-7,0.000004876587,8.979039e-7,0.00008231823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996994,0.00001728905,0.00009811723,0.00000379944,9.502069e-7,0.000001496794,0.00003317596,5.756649e-7,0.0001452288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008959268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01781422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03735276060354854,"score_gpt":0.282656753132396,"score_spread":0.2453039925288474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}