{"id":"W2000579138","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2010.12.001","title":"Social acceptability of alternative forest regimes in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, using stakeholder attitudes as metrics of uncertainty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Mount; Stakeholder; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Business; Socioeconomics; Economics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002306814,0.0001756343,0.0001568627,0.0006605819,0.001176615,0.001157455,0.0003451657,0.0005189723,0.001220913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006477317,0.0001585471,0.0002155501,0.0004941181,0.001960026,0.0005807832,0.001105672,0.0005708574,0.00006255658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001943699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006345717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03418233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07686053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985006,0.0009817156,0.00005771023,0.00006313796,0.0001526601,0.000244137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959133,0.002354013,0.001088368,0.0000959966,0.0002929425,0.0002554327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009766285,0.0002569406,0.9039529,0.0001069764,0.00013987,0.0009738377,0.06196806,0.004064185,0.001924213,0.007010184,0.0005446668,0.01808159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003093117,0.0003649972,0.917865,0.00007564767,0.00006490463,0.0001847121,0.06939544,0.007866391,0.0003067204,0.002882335,0.0009293613,0.0000334691],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992982,0.00001303322,0.00003388068,0.00008803035,5.327835e-7,0.00000241955,0.00001007865,3.302508e-7,0.0005535998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9999249,0.000006605454,0.00002049257,0.000004261548,4.181026e-7,0.000002416132,0.000003964589,1.295915e-7,0.00003674815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03418233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0679667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08353914426400243,"score_gpt":0.2687549964177556,"score_spread":0.1852158521537532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}