{"id":"W2000624622","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2013.10.044","title":"Visualizing protected variations in evolving software designs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems and Software","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; École de technologie supérieure","keywords":"Computer science; Software; Software visualization; Task (project management); Software design; Software engineering; Software analytics; Software construction; Software evolution; Visualization; Software development; Human–computer interaction; Data science; Data mining; Systems engineering; Engineering; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008685561,0.0001358318,0.0002985095,0.0004684032,0.0001046908,0.0005101355,0.0004897753,0.00009671805,0.00001203298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002974909,0.0001140569,0.00005412848,0.0005692118,0.00001942453,0.001204402,0.000129287,0.0003604886,0.00001124678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001336953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001605341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002525239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003550431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983413,0.0001316124,0.0005593716,0.0001852595,0.0004711229,0.0003113257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978243,0.0009440329,0.0002371202,0.0002546539,0.0005639461,0.0001759454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001680208,0.0003268922,0.9071875,0.001363953,0.0002458104,0.0004913647,0.009394388,0.009305535,0.004407324,0.003128431,0.005258508,0.05887355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001842974,0.0005932708,0.9167461,0.002536005,0.0000174063,0.001276594,0.0004462703,0.07264879,0.0001611355,0.002173825,0.0008421646,0.0007154799],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.104113,0.001610583,0.8933403,0.00009770471,0.0003724874,0.0003499609,9.070524e-7,0.0001105894,0.000004464169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.858456,0.00002129052,0.1412683,0.00001585667,0.0001204297,0.00003853011,3.147735e-7,0.00001716997,0.00006220025],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.754343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4919248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02924881058216502,"score_gpt":0.2726796775483301,"score_spread":0.2434308669661651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}