{"id":"W2000683594","doi":"10.1007/s10463-014-0470-0","title":"Minimax design criterion for fractional factorial designs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Minimax; Mathematics; Optimal design; Fractional factorial design; Estimator; Factorial experiment; Optimality criterion; Minimax estimator; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Mean squared error; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Matrix (chemical analysis); Statistics; Minimum-variance unbiased estimator","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04553119,0.002180633,0.005706208,0.002836999,0.001033702,0.002792699,0.002748342,0.003401898,0.006305037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09093445,0.001552694,0.001804409,0.001834495,0.003595549,0.003225429,0.0029371,0.00382059,0.0007048267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002248394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004400913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005959154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000457506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9694284,0.02382099,0.0009723156,0.001808627,0.003442165,0.0005274151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9126726,0.07901713,0.002014804,0.002430496,0.003306171,0.0005586607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00172886,0.0003514861,0.001069544,0.001346217,0.0005449686,0.0001112134,0.0003877659,0.2636446,0.005331454,0.572481,0.003632528,0.1493703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004560762,0.000921571,0.0007485528,0.0002535833,0.0001585928,0.0001051341,0.00004643991,0.5574948,0.002622689,0.4327069,0.004414306,0.00007138059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003667845,0.00025182,0.9946324,0.000179423,0.00003345845,0.000124731,0.00005476487,0.00006157016,0.0009940523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1584877,0.0007319843,0.8333707,0.0004829496,0.0002028358,0.002827938,0.0002827931,0.0001858615,0.003427142],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04553119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2407949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5060403338934417,"score_gpt":0.5212604005461885,"score_spread":0.01522006665274678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}