{"id":"W2000686365","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.05.003","title":"Estimating the economic value of British Columbia's domestic cannabis market: Implications for provincial cannabis policy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Drug Policy","topic":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; AIDS Vancouver; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Michael Smith Health Research BC; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Cannabis; Revenue; Law enforcement; Consumption (sociology); Business; Demography; Economics; Medicine; Geography; Law; Political science; Finance; Psychiatry; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002244386,0.0005085893,0.0009984176,0.002300752,0.002157722,0.006303298,0.001503218,0.001513616,0.006543228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0233959,0.0006265016,0.0006766955,0.00511322,0.001346559,0.002011175,0.001648777,0.002870691,0.0003313668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05271856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03764414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9740341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983554,0.0005257204,0.00006570342,0.0001470576,0.0003306258,0.000575447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905863,0.005806303,0.0005496774,0.000243636,0.001986703,0.0008273777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001534593,0.0004245825,0.5240663,0.0005849138,0.0007637719,0.001990049,0.001216584,0.3150172,0.0007801875,0.06233868,0.02919881,0.06208431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003792275,0.0002042098,0.435434,0.0004884628,0.0007517482,0.00027194,0.01788373,0.4695865,0.001661175,0.04129435,0.03180216,0.0002424578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9584649,0.001909653,0.001159863,0.01082325,0.00007142451,0.00008662906,0.005128998,0.00004129963,0.02231402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932034,0.0007127257,0.0005417273,0.0002404761,0.00002041865,0.00001821317,0.0009239895,0.00001149943,0.004327567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05271856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3825017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01058356412119348,"score_gpt":0.3427184588255799,"score_spread":0.3321348947043865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}