{"id":"W2000765972","doi":"10.1139/f06-117","title":"Could increased cyanobacterial biomass following forest harvesting cause a reduction in zooplankton body size structure?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Zooplankton; Biomass (ecology); Phytoplankton; Ecology; Cyanobacteria; Environmental science; Riparian zone; Biology; Nutrient; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003494221,0.0002033498,0.0002691459,0.0001852476,0.0003688447,0.0002571108,0.0001813602,0.0003691514,0.0006080374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006562427,0.0001478624,0.0002068595,0.0001501525,0.0006084098,0.0002292657,0.0001986161,0.0003465624,0.00009584826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004127175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003268898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004036672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01267541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998685,0.00002932571,0.000007733154,0.00002779533,0.00002345911,0.00004309313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995335,0.00009362796,0.0001774787,0.0000376812,0.0000490094,0.0001087323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002621891,0.0006343634,0.7755521,0.00006675711,0.0001161146,0.0003869031,0.0002139579,0.0002259527,0.2109147,0.00005204476,0.0001159068,0.009099398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001035409,0.0005698061,0.9954964,9.565589e-7,0.00001355799,0.00004240484,0.0000880396,0.0001392567,0.003560504,0.00002829487,0.000047465,0.000002959239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997813,0.00002841664,0.00006312026,0.00001695094,0.000001808404,0.000005825076,0.00003461899,0.000001565458,0.00006635569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995611,0.00003747092,0.00008129457,0.000037101,0.000003827052,0.00001054466,0.0001276521,0.000001258402,0.0001396352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008026361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008492259627828139,"score_gpt":0.2006287556655078,"score_spread":0.1921364960376797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}