{"id":"W2000770871","doi":"10.1115/esda2004-58476","title":"Performance Evaluation of the Optimal Control of a Gantry Crane","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Payload (computing); Gantry crane; Control theory (sociology); Robustness (evolution); Swing; Controller (irrigation); Computer science; Optimal control; Cart; Control engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Control (management); Mathematical optimization; Mechanical engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003211669,0.00004276422,0.000106381,0.00001092765,0.000009158261,0.000002388301,0.00008956024,0.00002908218,0.0000260555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000134571,0.00002717976,0.00004539897,0.00005129311,0.000009260489,0.00002839025,0.000005632572,0.00003543877,0.000002660411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003161814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000211342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001726946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008362622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994772,0.00001168857,0.0001666784,0.00003728303,0.0002405867,0.00006657335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997574,0.00001106393,0.00003060039,0.000118939,0.00006874801,0.0000132439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007320325,0.00001229737,0.0001598943,0.00002530905,0.00002807427,3.485111e-8,0.00002392727,0.9598531,0.03317314,0.002607403,0.000003006678,0.004106491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001422764,0.00002793563,0.003713538,0.00003495257,0.0000334142,0.00000102322,0.00001300464,0.9893838,0.005220886,0.0001013951,0.00001346291,0.00003383989],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760252,0.0001095347,0.01944372,0.00005237048,0.0001557051,0.0001838755,0.000002858143,0.00001714103,0.004009579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998493,0.00000503408,0.00008738632,0.000009496473,0.00001776543,0.000007946885,2.5788e-7,0.000005106131,0.00001776746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02953068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1108359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006751310197856228,"score_gpt":0.1963958790403529,"score_spread":0.1896445688424967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}