{"id":"W2000803742","doi":"10.2495/safe-v1-n2-126-146","title":"A methodology for undertaking vulnerability assessments of flood susceptible communities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Flood myth; Vulnerability (computing); Vulnerability assessment; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental health; Computer science; Computer security; Medicine; Psychology; Psychological resilience; Archaeology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008531414,0.00007402022,0.0001627835,0.00007039217,0.00003316296,0.0000104282,0.0002476635,0.0000327362,0.0002022875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004205198,0.00006761303,0.00006713119,0.00003933944,0.00005042473,0.0002390743,0.0001374574,0.0001205964,4.182097e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006290289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000743526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003009523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000131366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992809,0.00004626732,0.000324182,0.000059242,0.0001938234,0.00009558749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994922,0.000183141,0.0001762545,0.00006497974,0.00004773331,0.00003568575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005232028,0.003236631,0.4091915,0.0009099387,0.005132589,0.00009732984,0.08562255,0.1254725,0.05311931,0.2039503,0.0007418314,0.1072934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01372771,0.004948793,0.5306677,0.0008904859,0.0007173484,0.0003530578,0.02328728,0.2562951,0.04063885,0.08983042,0.03696858,0.001674701],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6745498,0.00007505048,0.322659,0.0001299158,0.0006147261,0.0001170115,0.000010627,0.000009154985,0.001834798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9473621,0.0001677187,0.05238864,0.00002436362,0.0000351262,0.000001910428,0.000002500151,0.000005299842,0.00001237203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2728123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2757179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0632814098588508,"score_gpt":0.3198294927707354,"score_spread":0.2565480829118846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}