{"id":"W2000828596","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.726-731.4237","title":"A Comparison of Three Biomass Estimation Methods: A Case Study of &lt;i&gt;Pinus tabulaeformis&lt;/i&gt; Forests in China","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advanced materials research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Pinus tabulaeformis; Biomass (ecology); Pinus <genus>; Mathematics; Statistics; Forestry; Linear model; China; Environmental science; Estimation; Econometrics; Ecology; Geography; Botany; Engineering; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004477574,0.0007620149,0.0004499146,0.002452672,0.0005416341,0.0006607975,0.0008591437,0.0005193781,0.0004066182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004438107,0.0002664172,0.000769264,0.00198045,0.0003581432,0.001024613,0.0005010191,0.0002257297,0.0001083854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001698215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009590782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07554001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1167525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987544,0.0005482351,0.00009181941,0.0002107321,0.000299513,0.00009529688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997221,0.001518866,0.0002599686,0.000160024,0.0007743326,0.00006580223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040414,0.0003181017,0.7597212,0.0004006717,0.0003971631,0.0008537641,0.001349541,0.04335904,0.003982571,0.0008265981,0.0005596452,0.1878276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006020048,0.0005154391,0.6682475,0.00006788206,0.0003899284,0.0004373949,0.002500253,0.3192672,0.006491761,0.0007743519,0.001150139,0.00009783028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899103,0.0004584327,0.008353614,0.00008970828,0.00000983492,0.00004738384,0.0001593622,0.000046791,0.0009245338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876215,0.0002901886,0.01154312,0.00001385651,0.000005294365,0.0000260935,0.0002234929,0.00000904363,0.00026737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07554001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1502006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04684138658584665,"score_gpt":0.4034956588301298,"score_spread":0.3566542722442831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}