{"id":"W2000949384","doi":"10.1289/ehp.1003396","title":"Risks and Benefits of Consumption of Great Lakes Fish","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Health Perspectives","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; University of Toronto; Université du Québec à Montréal; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks","funders":"","keywords":"Fish consumption; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Consumption (sociology); Fishery; Environmental science; Environmental health; Natural resource economics; Business; Biology; Medicine; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000308103,0.0004119641,0.00130921,0.00009839698,0.00009860026,0.000005155238,0.0002613952,0.0002193103,0.004606087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002479189,0.0003620671,0.0001902967,0.0001112174,0.001102435,0.0001602812,0.0002778361,0.0002878117,0.0001301123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007779545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004029575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002596489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009409447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977685,0.0002390515,0.0007089074,0.0005859723,0.0003057962,0.0003917258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983678,0.0001015242,0.0008647884,0.0004267665,4.826283e-7,0.0002386374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009856071,0.0002237302,0.001539533,0.001240783,0.00006010683,8.759986e-7,0.003018314,4.356317e-7,0.000007508825,0.00002688008,0.00006959962,0.9938024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001274065,0.002146854,0.6214005,0.008481873,0.0007604063,0.000317503,0.002389144,0.00000429413,0.0001635175,0.0001296294,0.3613403,0.001591867],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01288568,0.9839547,0.000003386645,0.0000212716,0.00006785693,0.0007448554,0.001819982,0.00001969079,0.0004826354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0439775,0.9555216,0.0002219229,0.00002020941,0.00002898833,0.00001113819,0.000009755555,0.00005148749,0.0001574386],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08347118869468137,"score_gpt":0.3373379048695586,"score_spread":0.2538667161748772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}