{"id":"W2000954718","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00686.x","title":"What about Design Newness? Investigating the Relevance of a Neglected Dimension of Product Innovativeness","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":223,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Berger (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Product (mathematics); New product development; Dimension (graph theory); Marketing; Product innovation; Argument (complex analysis); Relevance (law); Product design; Business; Product lifecycle; Perspective (graphical); Industrial organization; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01057472,0.0002250384,0.0005381452,0.001450115,0.0002083508,0.0002110609,0.0008915706,0.000045754,0.00004865291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009367181,0.0001294208,0.00008345115,0.01516541,0.0001723438,0.001508436,0.0001492316,0.0003569743,0.000003821571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006951839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001562611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000188956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.126665e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929146,0.0004407258,0.003645317,0.0003977823,0.002351639,0.0002499541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825379,0.0005001092,0.006320213,0.0006569058,0.009953111,0.00003171725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002101784,0.0002540625,0.0008167907,0.00006656414,0.00007213761,0.000006086967,0.001403734,0.004336751,0.3060805,0.03969933,0.005263493,0.6417903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00285615,0.001292437,0.248006,0.002924446,0.0001244519,0.0001083665,0.006866795,0.004715769,0.5564179,0.1509712,0.02498684,0.000729573],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.936101,0.0004636049,0.04672822,0.01373759,0.001466695,0.0009509535,0.000001624831,0.00002138905,0.0005289854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973252,0.00008523923,0.024857,0.001024023,0.000233571,0.000005234578,0.000004488694,0.00001026164,0.0005281766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6410608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.130894937093996,"score_gpt":0.3669369863824289,"score_spread":0.2360420492884329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}