{"id":"W2001028608","doi":"10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.057","title":"A national look at carbon capture and storage—National carbon sequestration database and geographical information system (NatCarb)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy Procedia","topic":"CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Geospatial analysis; Carbon sequestration; Database; Geographic information system; Carbon capture and storage (timeline); Computer science; Geography; Remote sensing; Climate change","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005528245,0.0005926173,0.0009066897,0.004862484,0.00192409,0.007170942,0.002623741,0.001814712,0.02119558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009678454,0.0007244864,0.0005184947,0.01259611,0.001135686,0.01146175,0.002970972,0.00346178,0.01053562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009051978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01928504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2099729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1908275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969726,0.0003067098,0.0004472953,0.0004789629,0.001542874,0.0002515752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876786,0.001219229,0.0005597271,0.002165328,0.006749554,0.001627496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008024948,0.00006199331,0.005251386,0.0001939669,0.00002667148,0.00008870228,0.0002020533,0.0008883176,0.001506384,0.02893926,0.8725984,0.09016273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001383959,0.0000123965,0.003221667,0.0001197809,0.000009387099,0.00007461922,0.0001210715,0.001144492,0.0006998426,0.003010971,0.991544,0.00002792306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01565713,0.01649558,0.08955165,0.111543,0.003656114,0.00121815,0.3740329,0.04477477,0.3430707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04611913,0.01390435,0.2500398,0.01922717,0.0007890863,0.0007662764,0.5890319,0.003071525,0.07705075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2099729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4175014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006616847945620843,"score_gpt":0.2094627388167817,"score_spread":0.2028458908711608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}