{"id":"W2001141755","doi":"10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00356-x","title":"Bird responses to partial retention timber harvesting in central interior British Columbia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Logging; Guild; Habitat; Understory; Forest management; Ecology; Wildlife; Sustainable forest management; Riparian zone; Transect; Foraging; Generalist and specialist species; Geography; Species diversity; Forest floor; Riparian forest; Environmental science; Biology; Ecosystem; Canopy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002665954,0.00005853152,0.00009230898,0.00003020253,0.0001501162,0.00005994303,0.00008164034,0.00006865602,0.001190069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004657762,0.00008921947,0.00001707433,0.0001388783,0.00009502075,0.0001530865,0.000199764,0.00006661982,0.0002684265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008387942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003983721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009257075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7096512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999123,0.00008042951,0.0001764373,0.0002650687,0.00005606823,0.0002990231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997751,0.00003216704,0.00003895393,0.00008685345,0.000002962413,0.00006394347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006981638,0.0000373548,0.9851182,0.000005787953,0.000007773845,0.0001625528,0.00005031763,0.0002159531,0.000007777966,0.00008159107,0.009124888,0.00511795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003767441,0.0001194258,0.9711806,0.00001720144,0.00001137186,0.00002653771,0.00003728978,0.0004397749,5.710318e-7,0.0005073163,0.02718972,0.00009345537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964597,0.000004255449,0.000196304,0.0009052217,0.0002366548,0.0003766888,0.000001128391,0.00005897778,0.001761019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839575,0.00004542723,0.0006133576,0.001476835,0.00002262884,0.0001187802,0.000003143793,0.000009565293,0.0137528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7003942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0104335141647536,"score_gpt":0.2104049509636818,"score_spread":0.1999714367989282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}